Which satellite phone is better: Globalstar or Iridium?

2 min read

Working professionals in areas like aviation, marine, and other industries find satellite phones to be helpful as they cover vast areas on the planet. They may offer full coverage or just a portion of it depending on the constellation of satellites the system has put in orbit. This blog will provide a comparative study of the two most popular satellite phones Globalstar and Iridium.

Two significant players in satellite communication are often brought up in discussions: Iridium and Globalstar. While both provide satellite phone and internet services, their technologies, service areas, and product offerings differ.

Globalstar Vs Iridium

·         Definition: Free Globalstar satellite phones operate a constellation of lower earth orbit that provide voice and data communication services. It is known for its great voice quality and affordable pricing in the areas it covers. On the other hand, Iridium boasts a larger constellation of satellites globally which provides amazing coverage and is known for its reliability in dense remote areas.

·         Coverage and reliability: Iridium satellite ensures coverage in most areas which makes it the go-to choice for individuals and companies that need communication from the remote part of the planet.While Globalstar is used in most regions but does not offer the same level of global coverage.

·         Technology and services: Globalstar uses a bent–pipe architecture where signals are transmitted directly from the user to the satellite and then down to the ground which results in a clear voice but it may happen that in remote areas there might be less or no coverage of signals. Iridium satellite phones can be used for communicating both ways offering continuous coverage even in a place where there is no network and is beneficial for marine professionals.

·         Cost considerations: Another factor to consider these satellite phones. Globalstar has lower costs and attractive pricing options for users who do not need global coverage. On the other hand, Iridium is more expensive because of its wide coverage and reliable network. Another alternative is Porsche Bluetooth which is used in satellite communications apart from these two.

Wrapping Up

Iridium and Globalstar both have advantages and which is better for a given user’s needs will depend on industrial requirements. Iridium offers a more costly but genuinely global and dependable service, while Globalstar offers a cost-effective option with good service within its coverage areas.

You May Also Like

More From Author